Thursday, April 23, 2009

George Steinbrenner Biography - Book Review Pt. 1

George was never a dynasty builder, because he was incapable of leaving well enough alone. He was a compulsive meddler who had to be in complete control over every aspect of the organization, and his most detrimental flaw was that he always thought that because he had once been a coach, he knew more about the sport than his coaches."
--Peter Golenbock, from the new George Steinbrenner biography, (You might be surprised to learn that the above quote is actually referring to a then 30-year-old George Steinbrenner's time as owner of the Cleveland Pipers, a professional

The folks over Wiley Publishing were kind enough to send over a copy of George: The Poor Little Rich Boy Who Built The Yankee Empire for NSI to check out. Wiley has also been cool about allowing us to publish a few excerpts from the book on our site, which we'll do in the next couple of weeks in a multi-part series. In the first hundred pages, it'll become painfully obvious to readers that taking the reigns of the Yankees wasn't really a matter of choice for Big Stein; it was more like a matter of time.

The first couple of chapters drag a bit: remembering old Yankee Stadium and ushering in the age of The House That George Built. It also covers George's childhood with his very strict father, his adolescent years, and his transition from annoying spoiled rich kid to annoyingly-successful-but-still-spoiled richer adult. If you stick it out, you'll be rewarded with some expository writing that sketches an enigmatic egomaniac in the making. In the anecdote below, Golenbock describes an all too familiar-sounding George, who ran his teams in his own distinct way:
"The Pipers [the basketball team Steinbrenner owned from 1960-62] had a slim lead over the Pittsburgh Rens, led by Connie 'The Hawk' Hawkins, and Steinbrenner saw that the Rens had to play three games against Hawaii right at the end ... The Hawk was averaging forty-two points a game, except when he played against [Pipers' Center Dick Brott], who held the star to seventeen points a game. George ... traded Brott to Hawaii so he could help them beat Pittsburgh and give the Pipers the ... championship. Remarkably, it turned out just that way."
Stories like the ones George includes don't happen by accident. No stranger to sports biographies, Golenbock answers a lot of the questions that Yankee fans and Yankee detractors have had since he took over the team in 1973: What the hell is wrong with this guy? How did he get this way? Was he always like this? This last passage epitomizes the relationship between George and his father, Henry, in the days when George was working for his dad as described by family friend Patsy Stecher:
"The father ... took him into a room, gave him holy hell, and fired George. The next morning Geroge was going to get up real early and clean out his office so he could have one-upmanship on his father ... there was a knock at the door [at George and his wife Joan's house], and it was his father, who was carrying all the contents of his office desk. He dumped it all on their living room floor and left. His father beat him to it."
The book is in stores now. Love him or hate him, it's a good read at under 350 pages. You know how the story ends, but it might be cool to find out how it wound up there.

Comments (4)

Loading... Logging you in...
  • Logged in as
I'm interested to hear if Golenbock has any hard-hitting commentary on Steiny's days trying to move the Yankees to Manhattan or even to [GASP] New Jersey.
I have the book and fully intend to read it, but a word to the wise here...Peter Golenbock has always had an axe to grind with Steinbrenner going back a long time, from "The Bronx Zoo" to "Number 1" (Billy Martin bio). He's an excellent writer and I have read quite a few of his books but he absolutely has an anti-George bias. Think Lupica but not as vicious.
1 reply · active 834 weeks ago
Interesting. Bobby - have you noticed an anti-Steiny bias so far?
-----------------
Tough to say, because if he doesn't go negative, people are disappointed that they bought a book about Stein that doesn't have anything juicy in it. But if he goes entirely negative, then people will criticize him for taking an unoriginal angle.

With that said, George himself is quoted in the book, so presumably he knew there was a book being written about him that he willingly contributed to with a few stories. I'm sure he didn't have final say over what went in it, but in the end if there's a biography being written about him, for better or worse, he's just happy that we're still talking about him all these years later.

Post a new comment

Comments by

SEO By Profit By Search India