Showing posts with label New Media impact on journalism. Show all posts
Showing posts with label New Media impact on journalism. Show all posts

Monday, May 11, 2009

Continuing Our Cause To Fix The New Yankee Stadium

A few days ago, we asked our fellow fans to help us come up with a solution to the problems that have plagued the new Yankee Stadium. We have yet to come up with the answer to any of the problems, but Bill Madden of the NY Daily News, and Will Leitch of NY Magazine have since written articles that really capture the essence of our cause.

Framed as a pleading letter to the ailing George Steinbrenner, Madden went down a laundry list similar to the one we compiled a few days ago. One paragraph in particular stood out in his impressive piece:
Remember when you were a kid, Boss, and your dad, Henry, brought you to your first Cleveland Indians game in old Municipal Stadium? What do you remember most about that day? Standing along the rail next to the dugout during batting practice, watching the players close-up and maybe getting an autograph or two on your scorecard? Can't do it in your ballpark, Boss, the ballpark you built and Trost overpriced. That's because you need a ticket for those “legend suite” $2,500 seats - now slashed to $1,250 - that rim the stadium from foul pole to foul pole. They're the ones so easy to spot on TV, Boss, because they're mostly empty and separated from the $300-$400 “field level” seats (also mostly empty) by what they call the “moat.” (The running joke among Yankee employees is that Trost plans to fill the moat with water and live alligators to further insulate his rich friends from the unwashed masses.)
Seeing a baseball game the way it was supposed to be seen - from the areas closest to the field, has become impossible for the common man. Will Leitch touched on a similar point in his article for NY Magazine, about his first experience sitting in those quarantined Legends Seats:
While the team has a right to be proud of its illustrious history, it is still, in the end, selling tickets to baseball games—with all the beer-sticky aisles, cheesy get-hyped music, and local-business scoreboard promotions that entails. And there’s nothing wrong with those things. (Well, in moderation.) They’re part of the charm of seeing a game, even for rich people who can afford good seats. The Yankees seem convinced they have to offer a new class of entertainment transcendence, failing to appreciate their own success in building a nice new stadium where fans can watch a very-good-to-excellent baseball team.


Sadly, it has come to the point where we, as Yankees fans, don't ever expect to attend a baseball game, see it from a premiere location and receive "added value". As a perfect example, we booked a trip to Arizona yesterday and a trip to a Diamondbacks game is on the docket. When looking for tickets, the first seats that we looked for on Ticketmaster and Stubhub were the upper deck seats. Why wouldn't we? Here in NY, that is where people "like us" sit for games.

Very quickly we realized that this social stigma did not exist at the Arizona Diamondbacks' Chase Field. In other words, we weren't going to have to spend a week's pay to see a baseball game the way it was meant to be seen. Seats comparable to the 100's level at the new Yankee Stadium (with prices in the $100's as well), cost a fraction of that at Chase Field. For around $45 each we could sit behind home plate, on the field level, for an inter-league game against the LA Angels of Anaheim (premium game), featuring post-game fireworks. That's right, we would even get to enjoy fireworks after the game.

Sure, fireworks don't add to the game at all, but isn't it nice for the hypothetical family and their hypothetical son "little Billy" to be able to look forward to a fireworks display after the game if advance pyrotechnics are their thing? As Yankees fans, we have been trained to expect the buttoned-up approach to the game of baseball for far too long. As young Yankee fans, we are trained that fireworks displays are for the "lesser" teams. As Yankees fans, the only fun we should have is the joy of watching our team win, and unless we are rich, we should expect to do so from the nosebleed seats. Meeting players, catching foul balls and most embarrassingly, fireworks displays are reserved for the teams not quite on the level of the New York Yankees. Forget the fact that the Diamondbacks have won a championship more recently than our beloved Yankees (2001), and have won a playoff series more recently as well (2007).

In our case these feelings have been locked up inside for a long time, and the opening of the glitzy new stadium has let them out. It does come as somewhat of a relief that those entrenched in the mainstream media brigade that follow the New York Yankees can understand our cause, and are willing to champion it. Hopefully the Yankees will reevaluate their view on the average fan's importance to the game of baseball and allay our concerns.

A great start would be eliminating the "luxury box" feel of the Legends seats. Ditch the amenities, and make them regular seats. If you want all you can eat food, get a luxury box. Unfortunately, the Yankees still see those seats and the "experience" they offer as the "bread and butter" of their new luxury stadium, so that change is highly unlikely.
Read the full post, after the jump

Wednesday, April 29, 2009

Regarding "She-Fan" Jane Heller, And Access To Information From The Yankees

I just came across a post on River Ave. Blues reviewing Jane Heller's recently released book, Confessions Of A She-Fan.

This part of the post especially caught my attention:
That frustration stems from a Yankee organization intent on limiting access. She tries to go through Jason Zillo, the Yanks’ media gatekeeper, but Zillo, who fields more than his fair share of calls like Heller’s, wants credentialed writers only around the Yanks. She tries every which way to make an end-run around Zillo. She tries to go after Jean Afterman and Suzyn Waldman, connecting to them on that female level. Waldman is responsive; Afterman is not. She befriends John Sterling and runs through her Rolodex searching for ways in to no success. It is, then, no surprise that the Yanks didn’t want Heller’s publishers to advertise her book in the Yankee Magazine this year.
I should have done due diligence about the topic of this book much, much sooner. If so, I would have read it already! In my relatively short time running New Stadium Insider (and before that NYY Stadium Insider), I have noticed these Yankee policies regarding access to information. Basically, they don't provide it unless you are in their fraternity of credentialed writers, largely working for an antiquated and nearly defunct medium. After all, only speaking to those guys gives the team greater control and a better chance of churning out stories that are part of their PR machine.

This is a hobby, but occasionally I'd like to be professional about it and get some first-hand information. Why don't we review some of the things that I requested official information from the Yankees about:
  • I asked them for comment about the relocation fiasco. No response
  • I asked them for comment about the obstructed view fiasco in February. No response
  • I asked them for comment about the Linda Ruth Tosetti story. No response
  • I am currently asking them for comment regarding a story I am working on. No response
I have tried to contact the Yankee media relations office by phone and by email. I have tried to contact official Yankee spokespeople at the Rubenstein PR firm. My efforts were futile and my requests fell upon deaf ears.

While my blog is not one of the credentialed media sources of the Yankees, thousands of people who visit the stadium end up here when looking for information about Yankee Stadium. Wouldn't it be in the Yankees best interests if they created some sort of dialogue between the two parties? Wouldn't it provide me with the means to disperse accurate information instead of having to write one-sided stories? Wouldn't it prevent stories read by thousands of Yankee fans from being based on speculation and unnamed sources in the ticket office? There once was a time when fan-blogs were all about opinions and they were read by very few people. Times have changed and the media landscape has evolved. A large majority of people receive their information from blogs - mainstream media or not.

At the end of the day, I don't want access and I don't want credentials. I know my role. I am a fan of the Yankees and I write about the experience of being a fan of the Yankees. It just so happens that my outlet for doing so has become a source of information for upwards of 40,000 people monthly. Since what I write is apparently read by more people than my mother (who I have banned from commenting, for obvious reasons), I occasionally seek information. I want to be able to pass this information along to the readers of New Stadium Insider, so they can go along their merry way knowing that they are as informed as possible. Is that so much to ask?
Read the full post, after the jump

Saturday, March 28, 2009

Will Stan's Survive The Yankee Stadium Move? What Stopped Us From Going To Find Out?

An article just published by the NY Times reminds us why we're a blog, and the NY Times is, well, the NY Times.

The article, chronicling the move of Yankee Stadium by one city block, examines the uncertainty that the owners of popular sports bar "Stan's" are facing now that the old stadium is no more.
“It’s really a big mystery,” said Mr. Dene, who bought the bar from his father, Stan Martucci, 11 years ago. “You can ask 10 people, and eight will tell you that the tradition and uniqueness of Stan’s will live on. And the other two will tell you you’ve got all this corporate competition and people will have to come to Stan’s with intent instead of stumbling upon it.”
The quote does a great job of encapsulating the feeling of defiant anxiety that the owner of the bar is feeling right now. It is also a quote that anyone could have gotten. This may just be a human interest story, but it is a human interest story that is only reported on by the mainstream media. So is this one that was also just published by the NY Times.

While reading the stories, we realized that there was absolutely no access required to gather the quotes and information. Is there any reason that articles like the ones linked above can't originate from this very blog? Katherine Bindly and Rebecca Flynt Marx did excellent work on the stories, and we try to stay humble. However, there are certain times when the journalism degree starts to rear its ugly head and we realize that perhaps we have the opportunity to help change the way people receive their news.

Blogs are hobbies - nobody is making a career out of it, not even Fake Steve Jobs - but what if we spent less time perusing our addictive RSS Feed and more time actually going out to find the news. Stadium Insider headquarters is just minutes from the 161 st. stop on the 4 train. What if some of those Google Reader hours were spent speaking to Louis Dene? A lot of us feel like in order to do something productive, we need to receive immediate compensation for it. Perhaps if more of us tested our limits more often, we really could change the world, one fluff piece at a time. Read the full post, after the jump

Tuesday, March 24, 2009

UPDATE: No All-Access Statium Tour For NSI

Apparently, some higher-ups at Turner caught wind of unimportant Yankee bloggers being given the All-Access Tour of the new Yankee Stadium, and have nixed it. There are no hard feelings toward the kind engineer who was willing to take us on the tour, but this just reeks of unprofessionalism on the part of Turner Construction. Just because we have a blog does not mean that we don't have plans or professional lives that we had to alter in order to make this happen. As a working professional, we had to move meetings around in order to leave work in time for this tour, and we told colleagues about the exciting opportunity. Now, all we are left with is embarrassment.

For the record, we were informed of the possibility of having to sign some sort of NDA regarding the tour and were told we would not be able to post photos. This was fine by us, as we were extremely excited about the opportunity to tour the stadium. We were under the impression that this was not a "secret" tour, as the engineer openly asked us if we wanted to take the tour on the public domain of Twitter. Therefore, we posted on our blog about the tour last night, encouraging the submission of questions for the engineers.

At the end of the day, it appears that this engineer was planning on taking us on the tour as personal guests, and not as members of the media on behalf of Turner Construction. We were misled into believing that this tour was arranged because of admiration for our blog, and that we were being encouraged to ask questions. We had plans to write a feature, just as if we were journalists from a newspaper invited on the tour.

If the intentions of this tour were clear from the beginning, this awkward and unprofessional situation would have never occurred. We didn't ever expect to be given this opportunity, so we don't have any illusions of entitlement. We just didn't want to tell our family and friends about it, only to have to suffer the embarrassment of telling them the tour was canceled, because we are bloggers. Read the full post, after the jump

Wednesday, March 4, 2009

Whats hot in the Yankee Blogosphere

Since I'm too busy at work to bless everyone with my invaluable Yankee commentary, I thought I'd share some of today's greatest hits from around the rest of the Yankee Blogoverse:

Proving yet again that quality beats quantity any day in the blogosphere, the incomparable Replacement Level Yankees Weblog posted an awesome analysis of the newest Yankee homegrown golden-boy, Brett Gardner. The odds are stacked against the second coming, although the Kenny Lofton comp gives us a bit of hope.

Steve over at WasWatching caught up with Newsday beat-writer Kat O'Brien. In a wide-ranging Q & A, Kat sharea that although she loves her job, she can't recommend the field of journalism to any young hopefuls. New media is infringing upon old media, and job security in the industry is at an all-time low. Hold on to your blogs people, a new day is coming.

Speaking of new media, Andrew over at Scott Proctor's Arm is all up on the Twitter. We here at Stadium Insider recently unlocked the vast landscape of Twitter by using the awesome TweetDeck. It is hard to understand, but Twitter seems to be something that will be around to stay. The word "tweet" however, is insufferable and silly. It better not get added to the dictionary. For more reading about Twitter, check out this informative article from last month's NY Mag by Will Leitch.

Providing the all too necessary comic relief, It Is High, It Is Far, It Is... Caught continues their top 10 names list with a list of the top 10 players to play for the Yankees with the name Jose. Good to see Molina quickly climbing the list. Be sure to head over to their often updated blog and check out some of the other name lists. It is fun stuff.

We have to sneak this one in - Jane Heller (author of the book and blog "Confessions of a She-Fan") apparently enjoyed Kaybli's previously linked "second coming" Brett Gardner photoshop enough to download it to her computer and re-upload it to her MLBlog. It was the perfect companion to Jane's comment about Brett Gardner being in her dreams. Please join us in reminding Kaybli to watermark his photoshops so people know where its at!

Enjoy this post while it lasts - I'm generally against aggregating links, as it comes off as lazy. Then again, this list probably took me longer to compile than most other blog posts, so I guess my productivity at work just took a major ding...

Talk about it in the Stadium Insider Forums!

Tax Season is here - Save By E-Filing Your Taxes and tell 'em Stadium Insider sent you - Only $19.95!
Read the full post, after the jump
SEO By Profit By Search India